Portfolio Eligibility Criteria
Purpose
Define clear rules for what belongs in the portfolio, what does not, and the minimum evidence required to keep reviewer trust high.
Scope
In scope
- New projects, case studies, or major portfolio additions
- Updates that materially change the portfolio narrative
- Changes that affect evidence, governance, or operational claims
Out of scope
- Minor copy edits that do not change meaning
- Routine maintenance (typos, formatting, link fixes)
Prereqs / Inputs
- Reviewer guide
- Evidence audit checklist
- Roadmap phase status
Procedure / Content
Inclusion criteria (must meet all)
- Evidence-first: Claims are backed by dossier, ADR, runbook, or threat model evidence.
- Public-safe: No secrets, internal endpoints, or sensitive operational detail.
- Reviewer value: The item strengthens evaluation of senior-level engineering judgment.
- Operational clarity: If the change introduces operational impact, a runbook exists.
Explicit exclusions (do not include)
- Speculative demos without evidence backing
- Incomplete work without validation or clear constraints
- High-risk domains without corresponding runbooks or threat models
- Projects that cannot be maintained without breaking evidence links
Evidence minimums (baseline)
- Dossier entry or dossier update when the change is material
- ADR when the change is a durable architectural or governance decision
- Threat model update when trust boundaries or entry points change
- Runbook when operational procedure is introduced or modified
- Release note entry for any portfolio-wide governance change
Eligibility checklist (quick gate)
- Meets inclusion criteria and does not violate exclusions
- Evidence minimums satisfied and linked
- Reviewer path updated if the change is material
- Release note planned or created (if required)
Validation / Expected outcomes
- Reviewer can trace each claim to evidence
- Portfolio remains cohesive and does not accumulate noise
- Evidence links remain current and build-safe
Failure modes / Troubleshooting
- Scope creep: enforce exclusions and require evidence minimums before merging
- Weak evidence: pause inclusion until evidence artifacts are complete
References
- Reviewer guide: /docs/00-portfolio/reviewer-guide.md
- Evidence audit checklist: /docs/70-reference/evidence-audit-checklist.md
- Roadmap: /docs/00-portfolio/roadmap/index.md