Feature: Reviewer Guidance
Purpose
- Feature name: Reviewer guidance
- Why this feature exists: Help reviewers understand how to evaluate the portfolio quickly.
Scope
In scope
- callouts describing the evaluation path
- guidance for evidence-first review
Out of scope
- project registry data
- internal documentation site navigation
- core pages include reviewer callouts
- evidence links configured
Procedure / Content
Feature summary
- Feature name: Reviewer guidance
- Feature group: Documentation and governance integration
- Technical summary: Callout components provide a structured reviewer path.
- Low-tech summary: Step-by-step hints that show where to start and what to check.
Feature in action
- Where to see it working:
/ and /cv pages.
Confirmation Process
Manual
- Steps: Open
/ and /cv, read the callouts, follow at least one suggested path.
- What to look for: Guidance is clear and links route to evidence.
- Artifacts or reports to inspect: None.
Tests
- Guidance out of date with the documentation structure.
- Callouts removed or hidden.
Long-term maintenance notes
- Update guidance as the reviewer journey evolves.
Source code references (GitHub URLs)
ADRs
Runbooks
Additional internal references
External reference links
Validation / Expected outcomes
- Reviewer guidance is visible and actionable on core pages.
Failure modes / Troubleshooting
- Missing guidance: restore callout content and verify links.
References